Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 2092

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : December | Volume : 17 | Issue : 12 | Page : FC01 - FC06 Full Version

Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Regarding Self-medication among Patients Attending the Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic at a Tertiary Care Hospital in West Bengal, India


Published: December 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64202.18774
Manab Nandy, Rahul Saha, Suhena Sarkar, Arpita Maitra, Swagata Koley, Shritama Banerjee

1. Professor and Dean of Student Affairs, Department of Pharmacology, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. MBBS Student, Department of Pharmacology, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal, India. 5. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Pharmacology, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 6. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Pharmacology, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Arpita Maitra,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaclogy, Burdwan Medical College, Baburbag, Burdwan-713104, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: arpitacnmc@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Self-medication is an important health issue. The rising tendency of self-medication has been a cause for concern. Rheumatic patients, being vulnerable to various symptoms like pain and fever, may resort to self-medication. Although several studies have been conducted among different populations, there is a lack of literature focusing on rheumatic disease patients in India.

Aim: To investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practice of self-medication among patients attending the Rheumatology Outpatient clinic at a tertiary care centre in eastern India.

Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic in Medical College Kolkata, a tertiary hospital in West Bengal, India, from July 21, 2021, to September 20, 2021. A total of 105 patients attending the rheumatology outpatient clinic were included in the study. Data were collected by conducting interviews with the patients using prestructured and prevalidated questionnaire after obtaining informed consent. The Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) of self-medication were assessed, and the data were statistically analysed using Chi-square tests.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 38.77 years±12.56 years. Among the 105 subjects, 61 (58.1%) were suffering from arthritis, 26 (24.8%) from Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), and 6 (5.7%) from kidney disease. A total of 75 (71.4%) study subjects reported that they knew what self-medication was. The majority of the patients (86.7%) were unaware of the common adverse effects. However, 90 (85.7%) stated that self-medication was generally not beneficial, whereas 9 (8.6%) held the opposite view. A total of 64 (61%) reported having practiced self-medication in the past year.

Conclusion: The present study reported a self-medication rate of 61%. Self-medication was found to be more frequent among the younger age group, females, and individuals with higher educational qualifications.

Keywords

Drug overuse, Prevalence, Rheumatoid arthritis, Self-treatment

In India, self-medication is an important health issue (1). According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), self-medication is defined as the use of medicinal products by consumers to treat self-recognised disorders or symptoms. It also includes the intermittent or continued use of medications prescribed by physicians for chronic or recurring diseases or symptoms (2). Self-medication also involves purchasing medicines without a prescription, using old prescriptions to acquire medicines, sharing medicines with relatives or peers, or using old unused drugs left at home (3). Self-medication is practiced worldwide in both urban and rural populations, including developing countries like India, because many drugs are dispensed over the counter without a prescription, making it a low-cost alternative for people (4).

There may be a few benefits of self-medication. It provides increased access to medication and early relief for the patient. The patient also has an active role in their own healthcare (5). However, there are potential risks associated with self-medication practices. These include incorrect self-diagnosis, delays in treatment, uncommon but severe adverse effects of drugs, drug interactions that may severely affect health, incorrect routes of administration, wrong dosages, incorrect choice of therapy, masking of severe diseases due to temporary symptomatic relief, and risks of dependence and abuse (5).

The rising tendency of self-medication has raised concerns in society. Rheumatic patients, who are vulnerable to various symptoms like pain and fever, may resort to self-medication. Although several studies have been conducted on self-medication among different populations, there is a lack of literature on rheumatic disease patients in India (6),(7). Furthermore, the full implications of this practice are not well understood in these patients. The present study aimed to provide a statistical insight into the prevalence and patterns of self-medication among patients attending the rheumatology outpatient clinic from a neutral standpoint, with the hope of improving patient care. Hence, present study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of self-medication among patients attending the Rheumatology Outpatient clinic at a tertiary care centre in eastern India.

Material and Methods

This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Rheumatology Outpatient Department of Medical College Kolkata, West Bengal, India, from July 21, 2021, to September 20, 2021. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Medical College Kolkata (Ref no- MC/KOL/IEC/NON-SPON/812/09/20, dated September 22, 2020). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Inclusion criteria: All patients attending the Rheumatology Outpatient clinic were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Critically ill patients, hospitalised patients, unstable and/or non ambulatory patients were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The prevalence (p) of self-medication among patients with rheumatologic diseases was obtained as p=71.92%=0.7192 from a previous study (8). The formula for sample size calculation was used as follows:

(n)=Z2pq/l2 (q=1-p);

with Z=1.96 for a 95% confidence interval and considering a precision of the study (l) as 12% of p=0.0863 (Precision of the study (l)=12% of p=12% of 0.7192=0.0863). The sample size was calculated to be 104 and rounded off to the nearest multiple of 5, resulting in a sample size of 105.

Study Procedure

For data collection, a questionnaire was devised by the researchers based on a previous study by Abay SM et al., (9). The questionnaire consisted of four sections. The first section included demographic information, the second section included information about the disease for which the study subjects had attended the rheumatology outpatient clinic, and the third and fourth sections included information about the study subjects’ knowledge, attitude, and practice of self-medication. Pre testing of the questionnaire was carried out on 20 study subjects attending the rheumatology outpatient clinic after obtaining their informed consent. After the completion of the questionnaire, the results were analysed. The questionnaire was validated to assess the degree to which the questions were properly understood or misunderstood, the effectiveness of the questions in providing accurate information, and any areas of information regarding the study that were neglected by the proposed questionnaire. Once the analysis was completed, the questions were modified, resulting in the final KAP questionnaire.

The survey questionnaire had both open-ended and closed-ended questions. Face and construct validity were conducted by peers like pharmacologists and community medicine experts. Completion time, acceptability of the survey questions, and feedback were recorded by the peers and changes were made accordingly. All study-related data were collected anonymously to ensure the strict confidentiality of the subjects’ identities. The finally prepared questionnaire was then used after checking satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.827). It contained a total of 33 questions distributed across four sections. The first section (Q1-Q6) captured demographic parameters, the second section (Q7-Q8) assessed information about the disease, the next section (Q9-Q12) gathered information about knowledge, followed by the assessment of attitude (Q13-Q16), and finally, practice was assessed (Q17-Q33).

A total of 12 questions were closed-ended, whereas the remaining 15 questions were open-ended with comments or multiple choices (excluding the demographic questions). Data for each question were recorded descriptively in terms of frequency and percentage. Socioeconomic class was determined according to the Upgraded BG Prasad scale (10). Data were collected by interviewing the patients and asking questions from the pre-structured questionnaire after obtaining informed consent.

Statistical Analysis

The data from the interviews are transcribed onto an Excel database, and statistical analysis is conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software version 26.0. Data for each question are presented descriptively in the form of frequency and percentage.

Results

In the present study, the mean age of the study subjects was 38.77±12.56 years, with an age range of 18-60 years. Out of 105 study subjects, 78 (74.29%) were female, 85 (81%) were married, 60 (57.14%) were homemakers, and 57 (54.29%) were from the middle-lower socioeconomic class. Among the 105 study subjects, 61 (58.1%) were suffering from arthritis, 26 (24.8%) were suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus, 6 (5.7%) were suffering from kidney disease, 4 (3.8%) were suffering from diffuse lupus erythematosus, and 8 (7.6%) were suffering from other diseases (Table/Fig 1).

A total of 75 (71.4%) study subjects said that they knew what self-medication is, while 30 (28.6%) didn’t know what self-medication is. On the contrary, 33 (31.4%) mentioned that early treatment and early relief are the benefits of self-medication. The majority of the patients, 91 (86.7%), were unaware of the common side-effects that may occur after self-medication (Table/Fig 2).

Knowledge of self-medication is more prevalent in the age group less than 38 years, homemakers, married individuals, and those with secondary education (mean age of the study population was 38.77±12.56 years) with a female preponderance. Age is significantly associated with knowledge of self-medication (p-value <0.00001) (Table/Fig 3). In the present study, most of the study subjects, 90 (85.71%), considered self-medication to be overall not beneficial, mostly due to rare but severe drug reactions and delays in treatment. However, 40 (38.1%) study subjects thought that they can treat common diseases through self-medication (Table/Fig 4).

A positive attitude toward self-medication is more common in the age group above or equal to 38 years, males, farmers, study subjects with the highest educational qualification as primary school, and those with socioeconomic status Class-I, which is the upper class (Table/Fig 5).

Among the 64 subjects practicing self-medication, 34 (53.1%) selected brands based on the recommendation of pharmacists, 17 (26.6%) selected brands based on previous doctor’s prescriptions, and 4 (6.2%) selected based on their own experience. Among the 64 subjects practicing self-medication, 59 (92.2%) never checked the instructions that came with the package insert, while 4 (6.2%) checked them always. Total 59 (92.2%) never deliberately changed the dosage of the drug during the course of self-treatment, while the remaining 5 (7.8%) changed the dose sometimes (Table/Fig 6).

The practice of self-medication is more prevalent in the age group less than 38 years. Self-medication practice is more prevalent in females. Among different occupations, maximum self-medication prevalence is seen in students and farmers. Study subjects with the highest educational qualification (graduation and above) show the maximum prevalence. According to socioeconomic status, Class-V socioeconomic class, which is the upper class, shows the maximum self-medication prevalence (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

The prevalence of self-medication among patients attending the rheumatology outpatient clinic was reported to be as high as 61% in the present study. In a study conducted in Africa, 71.92% of patients suffering from rheumatic diseases were found to practice self-medication (8). Another study showed a prevalence of 65% for self-medication practice (11). The prevalence of self-medication in the general population of India has been reported to be 53.57% (12).

However, the scarcity of data regarding the prevalence of self-medication in patients suffering from rheumatic diseases in India made it difficult to compare the extent of self-medication among patients with rheumatic diseases on a national scale. Additionally, the prevalence was observed to be higher among females than males in present study, which is consistent with other studies (13),(14). Self-medication was also found to be more prevalent in younger age groups (below 38 years of age).

In the present study, self-medication practice was found to be most prevalent among students and farmers, participants with the highest educational qualification (graduation and above), and participants from socioeconomic Class-V, which is the lower class. In a study conducted among the elderly population in urban areas of Mexico, self-medication was reported to be statistically associated with lower educational qualifications, while another study showed that self-medication is very common in educated populations (15). Another study in South India showed that no significant association was found between educational qualifications (p=0.080) and the use of self-medication (16). A study conducted on rheumatic patients suggested that self-medication seems to be a complex phenomenon that likely integrates socio-cultural habits of patients with a tendency to self-support for health problems that they believe to be minor (8).

In the present study, 71.4% of the study subjects stated that they know what self-medication is, while only 13.3% of subjects knew the most common side-effects of the drugs they use the most. Thus, it is clear that there is a lack of appropriate knowledge about various aspects of self-medication in the population. The lack of appropriate knowledge about side-effects in patients with rheumatic diseases is supported by a previous study (17). The prevalence of knowledge was 71.4%, which is a finding similar to other studies where 64% (299 out of 466 respondents) of the subjects were found to have good knowledge (18). Knowledge was more frequently present in subjects under the age of 38 years. Age was significantly associated with knowledge of self-medication (p-value <0.00001). Knowledge was also more commonly observed in younger age groups (below 38 years old), females, students, and subjects with the highest educational qualification, such as higher secondary, graduation, and above, as well as subjects from the upper-middle socioeconomic status.

In the present study, although 85.7% of the study subjects believed that self-medication is overall not beneficial, 38.1% believed that they can treat common minor diseases through self-medication. Hence, the overall attitude of the study respondents was negative towards self-medication, which contrasts with another study showing a positive attitude (3). Time constraint was the most common reason (42.2% of subjects practicing self-medication) for self-medication, which is supported by another study showing quick relief as the most important cause (3).

The most common indication for self-medication was fever (54.7% of subjects practicing self-medication), followed by arthralgia (29.7% of subjects practicing self-medication), which is an important symptom of rheumatic diseases. A study by Kumar N supported this result, showing that antipyretics are the most common class of drugs used by the participants of the study, followed by analgesics and antibiotics (19).

The prevalence of self-medication due to fever is reported to be 55.3% in a study conducted in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) (20). In present study, 45.3% of participants selected drugs based on indication only, while 37.5% selected drugs based on the brand. The selection of a brand was mostly influenced by pharmacist consultation (53.1% of participants practicing self-medication), followed by previous prescriptions (26.6% of participants practicing self-medication). The dosage of drugs was mostly decided after consulting pharmacists (59.4% of participants practicing self-medication). This high reliance on pharmacists can be attributed to the decision-making process of the study participants.

The main source of drugs was found to be pharmacy stores, which was the only source for 93.8% of respondents and one of the sources for others. This finding is similar to another study that showed pharmacies as the main source of drugs used for selfmedication in 97% of cases (6). In the majority of cases (65.6% of participants practicing self-medication), drugs were stopped after the disappearance of symptoms. However, if this practice leads to irrational use of medicines like antibiotics, it may contribute to antibiotic resistance (21). The most common chronic condition causing self-medication was found to be acidity. Another study also showed that acidity is a common indication for self-medication (22).

Limitation(s)

The present study has some limitations also. It is primarily conducted in urban settings and relies on self-reported data, which may introduce recall bias. A larger sample size with a longer time frame could help mitigate these limitations.

Conclusion

A study conducted in a rheumatology OPD revealed that 61% of the patients were found to be practicing self-medication. It was observed to be more common among females and individuals below 38 years of age, particularly those with higher educational qualifications. While the majority of them demonstrated adequate knowledge (71.4%) regarding self-medication, only a few (13.34%) were aware of the potential side effects associated with the drugs they were using. Furthermore, most of them exhibited a negative attitude towards the overall benefits of self-medication. The primary reason for selfmedication was fever, and the pharmacist’s recommendation played a decisive role in determining the choice of drug brand and dosage. This high prevalence of self-medication, without proper awareness of the associated side effects, is a significant concern. To address this issue, it is recommended to conduct training programs and future studies aimed at increasing patient awareness.

References

1.
Greenhalgh T. Drug prescription and self-medication in India: An exploratory survey. Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(3):307-18. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
World Health Organisation (WHO). Guidelines for the regulatory assessment of medicinal products for use in self-medication [Internet]. Apps.who.int. 2021 [cited 28 November 2021]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66154.
3.
Kudyar P, Rani S, Malhotra P. Knowledge, attitude & practice towards self-medication among nursing students in a teaching hospital of north India. Indian J Pharm Pharmacol. 2018;5(4):159-63. [crossref]
4.
Hussain S, Malik F, Hameed A, Ahmad S, Riaz H. Exploring health seeking behavior, medicine use and self medication in urban and rural Pakistan. Southern Med Review. 2010;3(2):32-34.
5.
Ruiz ME. Risks of self-medication practices. Curr Drug Saf. 2010;5(4):315-23. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Mortazavi SS, Shati M, Khankeh HR, Ahmadi F, Mehravaran S, Malakouti SK. Self-medication among the elderly in Iran: A content analysis study. BMC Geriatrics. 2017;17(1):198. Doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0596-z. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Badiger S. Self-medication patterns among medical students in South India. Australasian Medical Journal. 2012;5(4):217-20. Doi: 10.4066/amj.2012.1007. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Ouédraogo DD, Zabsonré/Tiendrebeogo JW, Zongo E, Kakpovi KG, Kaboré F, Drabo JY, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with self-medication in rheumatology in Sub-Saharan Africa. Eur J Rheumatol. 2015;2(2):52-56. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Abay SM, Amelo W. Assessment of self-medication practices among medical, pharmacy, and health science students in Gondar University, Ethiopia. J Young Pharm. 2010;2(3):306-10. Doi: 10.4103/0975-28 1483.66798. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Khairnar MR, Kumar PG, Kusumakar A. Updated BG prasad socioeconomic status classification for the year 2021. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent. 2021;19(2):154-55. [crossref]
11.
Riedemann GJP, Illesca PM, Droghetti RJ. Automedicación en individuos de la Región de la Araucanía con problemas musculoesqueléticos. Revista médica de Chile. 2001;129(6):647-52. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Rashid M, Chhabra M, Kashyap A, Undela K, Gudi SK. Prevalence and predictors of self-medication practices in India: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2020;15(2):90-101. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Smogavec M, Softič N, Kersnik J, Klemenc-Ketiš Z. An overview of self-treatment and self-medication practices among Slovenian citizens. Zdrav Vestn [Internet]. 1 Nov. 2010 [cited 28 Nov. 2021];79(11):757-63.
14.
Gupta S, Chakraborty A. Pattern and practice of self-medication among adults in an urban community of West Bengal. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(5):1858- 62. Doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1823_20. Epub 2022 May 14. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Balbuena FR, Aranda AB, Figueras A. Self-medication in older urban mexicans: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. Drugs Aging. 2009;26(1):51-60. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Bennadi D. Self-medication: A current challenge. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2013;5(1):19-23. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Ornbjerg LM, Andersen HB, Kryger P, Cleal B, Hetland ML. What do patients in rheumatologic care know about the risks of NSAIDs? J Clin Rheumatol. 2008;14(2):69-73. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Wu YX, Wang EH, Zhao XJ, Han FX, Zhang JG, Cui L, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of medication among Haikou residents. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(6):6883-91. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Kumar N, Kanchan T, Unnikrishnan B, Rekha T, Mithra P, Kulkarni V, et al. Perceptions and practices of self-medication among medical students in coastal South India. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e72247. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Sridhar SB, Shariff A, Dallah L, Anas D, Ayman M, Rao PG. Assessment of nature, reasons, and consequences of self-medication practice among general population of Ras Al-Khaimah, UAE. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2018;8(1):03-08. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Michael CA, Dominey-Howes D, Labbate M. The antimicrobial resistance crisis: Causes, consequences, and management. Front Public Health. 2014;2:145. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Deshpande SG, Tiwari R. Self-medication- A growing concern. Indian J Med Sci. 1997;51(3):93-96.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64202.18774

Date of Submission: Mar 27, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 11, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Oct 10, 2023
Date of Publishing: Dec 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 31, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 24, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 07, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com